The daily cost to run construction sites can amass to tens of thousands of dollars. That is why businesses in the construction industry require such strict enforcement of schedules. A day over could literally cost clients and/or vendors thousands of dollars. In the construction industry, a critical path schedule is one of the fundamental documents. When a discrepancy arises about who is responsible for a negative impact on the schedule, experts perform forensic schedule analysis Experts testify on matters that would be difficult to translate to the laymen. Often they would have to hire graphic artist to illustrate the schedule impact being described by the experts testimony. This was costly, extremely time consuming, and not mathematically grounded. Thus, the Genesis of Netpoint.

Schedules are created to serve as communication tools and to allow projects to be managed proactively. But scheduling is an ineffective process when only the scheduler can comprehend the result. NetPoint transforms scheduling into an engaging and interactive planning-centric experience. The resulting plan is a unique visual tool that can be understood by the entire project team, regardless of their level of expertise. In addition, NetPoint can toggle between Critical path method ( CPM) and Graphical path method ( GPM) , so the transition is easy for experienced CPM schedulers.

The interesting thing is that most of our clients purchase Netpoint for completely different reasons than what we originally envisioned. . The most popular use is for collaborative project planning. This brings to mind one of my favorite scenarios; “The Prisoner’s Dilemma” attributed to Merrill Flood and Melvin Dresher. If two prisoners are interrogated, they can only work with what they know to create their best chances for leniency. If neither talks, they get the easiest sentence. If both talk, they get the harshest sentence. If one talks and the other doesn’t, the one who spoke-up will get leniency. The prisoner’s dilemma is that only the interrogators know who confessed to what, thus creating the dilemma in the decision the prisoners have to make.

The same, albeit unintentional, dilemmas happen in construction project management and collaboration. I wrote a paper a few years ago on the Gaines optimization theory, “From Asymmetry to Transparency in Project Planning – An Approach to Collaborative Project Planning.” The paper speaks about symmetry of information as it relates to the benefits and risks of various approaches to sequencing and executing project work. One of the key benefits of collaboration is the increased transparency. Another good reference that speaks to this is, “Broken Buildings- Busted Budgets” by Barry LePatner.
unica-web.com commander viagra Save time and money by ordering from our convenient, discreet and in-expensive Indian online pharmacy. Men are levitra price unica-web.com concern to bring out the issue or talk about in public. You might require more direct touch to unica-web.com order viagra viagra your penis to the measure of your decision actually furthermore totally normal. It’s a world in which you can get an erection in order to do sexual 50mg sildenafil generic intercourse.

The key concept that I’ve learned is that the friction point for teams of all kinds when planning collaborative projects is the risk and implications of interdependencies which are not well understood by the group. Teams come to planning sessions prepared to defend their goals, ideas and processes from colleagues who have no knowledge of all the intricacies necessary for a successful implementation from their point of view.

NetPoint offers the ability to plan a project and see a projected a graphical representation or model of the plan. The team can see the immediate impact of decisions. NetPoint mitigates conflicts between functional areas and allows for transparency in planning. The power of visualization and collaboration cannot be over estimated.