The Impact of GPM on Planning and Scheduling
Transcript below:
Brandies: Our guests today are Daniel Molnar, Project Controls Lead of the Northeast region of Merck Pharmaceuticals and Tim Mather, Chief Technical Officer at PMA Consultants and PMA Technologies. I’m Brandies Dunagan, a social media specialist at i.c.stars.
Today we’re going to discuss the impact of the Graphical Path Method on scheduling and planning.
Brandies: So Dan, can you describe your role at Merck?
Dan: Sure. As project controls lead, I tell everybody it’s a pretty easy job. My job is to tell project managers that they’re over budget and behind schedule. But truly, the division that I work for manages over a billion dollars of capital a year, and our role is to support project management teams in developing their schedules and their budgets and keeping track of the progress of the work.
Brandies: Okay, and since we’re talking about the Graphical Path Method, Tim, can you tell us a little bit about the history of GPM, Netpoint, and a little bit about the founder, Dr. Gui Ponce de Leon, PE, CEO and Managing Principal at PMA Consultants?
Tim: I sure can. So Netpoint is really the outgrowth of the GPM as conceived by Dr. Gui, as we can call him, because the Ponce de Leon PE Lead AP PMP takes too long. Dr. Gui came to the United States from Lima, Peru in the 60s and was the first Ph.D. in Construction Management at the University of Michigan; and his doctoral thesis is on the topic of alter algorithms for the computation of critical path networks. So he’s been thinking about this stuff for a while because I think he got his doctorate in ’72 and activated PMA shortly thereafter.
Our organization has grown over the years. It’s a nationwide project and program consulting firm. We do project controls work. We also do owner’s representation work and expert witnessing when projects go wrong – which we would never have to do for Merck because Dan is in place to manage that.
Brandies: Of course.
Tim: So Dr. Gui conceived of this idea of a different way of calculating the critical path. We started to work on the software maybe in 2006 or 2007 to bring his idea to life, and his idea was really to graphically and gesturally be able to manage a project schedule versus the database driven method that were used in CPM.
Brandies: Okay, and since we’re asking about CPM and the Graphical Path Method versus the Critical Path Method, just so we understand a little bit better about CPM, and we understand this traditional approach to develop project plans- you’ve introduced GPM as the evolution of that approach. Can you talk about some of the weaknesses that Netpoint addresses in CPM?
Tim: Sure. CPM was originally conceived in the 1950s as a method of modeling a schedule in order to create a timeline of a project. Nobody had done that. Prior to that, the state of the art was a Gantt chart. It didn’t have the kind of logical ties for predecessors and successors that you would find in CPM. In order to accomplish that, the developers of CPM used a formula that they called the early date and late date; forward pass and backward pass; and it’s a way of running through the network of activities and calculating what the early start date would be for each activity and then each successor activity, and then on the way back, what the late start date would be for each successor activity. Those late dates and early dates are kind of forced in CPM and the big breakthrough in GPM, although there’s a lot that can be talked about in GPM. But the big breakthrough is that because we don’t use that forward pass and backward pass, we have a kind of different algorithm. We’re able to set activities right on their planned date.
So whenever the planner wants the activity put on the date that’s where it stays. In a typical CPM application if you put an app, say you put an activity on March first, but it’s predecessor activity ends let’s say February third, then CPM is going to move your activity back to February fourth, unless you constrain it. Whereas in GPM, wherever you put the activity that’s where it sits and it just gives the planner so much more control over the way the network develops and it’s a much more intuitive way for non-scheduling experts to look at a plan and to help develop a plan and part of the big difference between GPM and CPM, is that with GPM – with it’s very intuitive and accessible graphics – you can access subject matter experts who normally get kind of confused by a CPM application. They can engage in a GPM planning session in a way that a CPM planning session kind of falls flat.
Read More
IT’S A CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUE
The First Amendment enshrines every American’s right to the freedom of expression. Our goal is to elevate and facilitate the exercise of that right in project planning.
“Chase after truth like hell and you’ll free yourself, even though you never touch its coattails,” said Clarence Darrow, US defense lawyer (1857 – 1938).
Sticky notes on a wall for the collaborative generation of the schedule framework (the planning phase) is suboptimal. The first step of sticky notes on a printed time scale is limiting in and of itself. Transferring the information from sticky notes to CPM software (the scheduling phase) creates a further dissipation of the group consensus. Not only is the sticky note process two steps, but the second step is rarely accomplished in a collaborative fashion. Consequently, many of the benefits of a fully collaborative session are not realized.
Until very recently, the two-step process was unavoidable. With NetPoint we are able to accomplish a virtual, real-time, full-wall planning session, utilizing the Graphical Planning Method® (GPM). GPM is a graphical, interactive, real-time planning method anchored on object-oriented principles and network based math rules. We can quickly create a visual model of our plan and then manipulate the model to explore alternative delivery modalities.
Read More
Malcolm Gladwell talks Innovation at the PMI Global Congress
I recently presented a paper at the Project Management Institute, North American Global Congress. My paper was titled the Job Shop Scheduling Problem, Mathematical Complexity Theory, and Non-Polynomial Time Algorithms. As you can imagine, a rather narrow swath of the PMI congregants found my topic compelling enough to part with an hour of their time. I joked with my single digit audience that I should have put the word Agile in the title, and the room would have been full. Another presenter at the same conference was Malcolm Gladwell. His topic was broader in nature. As his name recognition, accomplishments, presentation skills, and writing were somewhat superior to my own, he enjoyed an audience approximately 1000 times larger than I did. Gladwell is a compelling thinker and speaker. He talked about organizational culture and the role it has historically played in innovation. Having read all of his books, most of his articles, and listened, more than once, to his hilarious appearances on The Moth Story hour, I was rife with anxious anticipation at the thought of seeing him speak live. I was not disappointed.
Malcolm started with the statement: “We place such a premium on being first.” The entire patent system is predicated on the notion of being first and reaping huge rewards. But followers and borrowers, not leaders and inventors, are the ones who lead the way.
Read More
Innovation
We call NetPoint innovative. But as my Philosophy professors would chant from morning to night, “Define your terms.” Just what the hell is innovation anyway? Webster’s says it is, “The introduction of something new.” Most likely this is not the narrowest of definitions to be found in Webster’s. You hear the term everywhere, but who can define it? How can we, “drive innovation in the organization” if we don’t know what it is? Maybe it’s like pornography; you know it when you see it. The subject of innovation has been brought to my mind, particularly with the recent loss of Steve Jobs.
In Cambridge, at the MTA Kendall/ MIT station, there is a plaza with engraved paving stones featuring technology icons. Steve’s paving stone became a memoriam with candles, flowers and… apples. Although most often described as a visionary, Jobs was most certainly, by Webster’s definition, an innovator. What were his innovations? Were they simply the creation of the new? Novelty? Style? UI? Do innovations have to be adopted and successful, in order to be innovations? Walking past the MIT bookstore at the same MTA station, I saw a banner in the window featuring the phrase “inventional wisdom”, a phrase MIT has adopted as a part of their sesquicentennial celebration this year. At first I thought the word inventional was an unsuccessful attempt by MIT at innovating on the English language, further research revealed only my own abundant ignorance. Yes Tim, inventional is a word in the dictionary. Read More
Project management as a fulcrum and lever
Archimedes famously said “give me a lever, a place to stand, and I will move the world.” Although since 2008 the idea of leverage has lost some of its appeal, at least in the financial sector, the original concept is still true and sound. Is there a scheme of thought or accumulated knowledge base which stands to offer our endeavors greater leverage than Project Management?
I once had the opportunity to listen to a speech by Greg Ballesteros, the then President of the Project Management Institute. Greg was discussing the impact of project management globally; in business, government, and humanitarian efforts. It struck me while I listened to his speech that project management is perhaps our best opportunity to accelerate the progress of mankind. Greg’s speech made me realize that the discipline of project management yields better results, not just in business, but in life. As a matter of fact, our firm has trademarked the phrase, “life is a project”, and this phrase gets to the heart of my passion for project management.
Read More
Interactive graphical project planning, why it matters
Ever been in a project meeting where everyone is talking past each other, pointing fingers, evading accountability? If not, then you haven’t been in a project planning meeting.
Talk is cheap. Wait, no, it’s not; talk is really expensive. The cost of everyone sitting around the table spins up faster than a taxi meter in Manhattan. Talk is ephemeral, imprecise, and inconclusive. As Ludwig Wittgenstein famously intoned “You learned the concept ‘pain’ when you learned language”. He also said “What can be shown, cannot be said.”, and “A picture is a fact.”
The interpersonal dynamic of the project planning session completely changes when a time-scaled, interactive model of the projects displayed on the wall for all to see. Interdependencies, activity durations, and resource allocations are all plainly shown. Issues of accountability and responsibility are no longer vague concepts for debate, they are a picture. And not a still shot, but a dynamic motion picture, reflecting the impact of suggested changes in the project plan in real time. Read More